fishery house
 

News

2010 Fishery Review

click here for PDF

 

April 2008
CLOSE SEASON APPLIES TO STILLWATERS WITHIN THE NORFOLK & SUFFOLK BROADS AREA!

As many of you are aware the close season for coarse fishing on stillwaters was abolished in 1995, except in the Norfolk & Suffolk Broads where the season remained under a Broads Authority Bylaw.  This was in recognition that unlike other stillwaters the stocking was not the responsibility of one discreet body and that The Broads have special conservation value.

Towards the end of last year the Environment Agency contacted fishery owners and anglers informing them that this bylaw applied to all fisheries within the Broads region, not just the Broads themselves.  Amongst those that were contacted were restored gravel pit owners and a purpose built coarse fishery, neither of which are connected to the Broads, and both of which have been fished without regard to a close season for upwards of 13 years!  The Environment Agency issued strong warnings that anglers risked being prosecuted if they fished in the close season.

Why the Environment Agency suddenly adopted this position is unclear, especially as within their own publications promoting fishing venues some of the affected fisheries were listed as providing year round fishing! 

The implications of this to commercial fisheries and angling clubs in having their income / fishing reduced by 3 months per year are significant. A commercial fishery could find its turnover reduced by up to a ¼, yet a similar fishery, close by, yet outside of the “Broads Area” remain unaffected.  This would have obvious affects on the capital values of such fisheries should they ever be sold as well as a more immediate affect on their cashflow.

As part of our work Fenn Wright have responsibility for the management of several let fisheries within the Broads area and we are most concerned about this development.  We, along with several others, have been in correspondence with the Environment Agency about this and the latest release from the Environment Agency conceded that there may not be justification for the close season being kept on these waters. However, they maintain that until the Bylaw can be revised (possibly not for another 18 months) it will remain illegal to fish these waters during the close season.

April 2008

 

For more news click on the panels below

November 2007
For the urgent attention of Fishery Owners
Capital Gains Tax Reform 

If you are considering selling your Fishery in the near future you will need to be aware of significant changes to the Capital Gains Tax System which the H M Revenue and Customs 2007 Pre-Budget Report has announced. 

Fishery owners need to carefully consider how these changes could affect a Capital Gains Tax Liability to establish whether it is beneficial to complete a disposal before or after 6th April 2008. 

Summary of Changes: 

  1. A single rate of 18% to be applied to gains

  2. Withdrawal of taper relief

  3. Withdrawal of indexation allowance

  4. Calculation of gain on assets held on 31st March 1982 to be made using their market value on that date instead of cost. 

The reforms affect individuals, trustees and personal representatives but not companies and apply to any disposals made on or after 6th April 2008.

December 2005
Fishery dwelling deemed unnecessary for security

In a recent appeal ruling Planning Inspector Chris Turner rejected plans for a house to be used by the manager of a fishery in the Derbyshire green belt on the grounds that there was no functional need for somebody to live permanently on site.

The appellants argued that someone needed to live on the land to ensure the security of the fish stocks because alternative methods were too expensive and would not provide the same degree of security.  The Inspector noted PPS7’s advice that the protection of livestock from theft or injury may contribute to the need for a dwelling, but he did not accept that this was sufficient justification by itself.  The Inspector commented that police evidence did not state that a dwelling was the only means of improving security.

The Inspector also doubted the business’s ability to afford the construction of a dwelling.  He foresaw a significant risk that the business would fail, leaving a new dwelling in the countryside.  He felt that this would increase pressure for residential use to become unencumbered and available for sale on the open market.  As there was no functional need and the financial position of the business was unproven, he dismissed the appeal.

 

 



Please contact a member of the Fisheries Team

01206 216555

email: mjf@fennwright.co.uk   

   www.fennwright.co.uk 
Chartered Surveyors, Estate Agents, Property Consultants
1 Tollgate East, Stanway, Colchester. CO3 8RS

Regulated by RICS